On 27/03/13 16:19, Ian Melven wrote: > another very common MITM situation is a captive portal on public wireless.
True; I think a warning is entirely appropriate in that situation. > personally, i'm reluctant to conflate network attacks with private browsing > mode, > i believe it's already difficult for users to understand what private browsing > mode does and doesn't protect against and i think this would make it more so. > > IMO, it would be more productive to focus on captive portal detection > and more specific/differentiated SSL warnings for all browsing modes. Fair enough. Gerv _______________________________________________ dev-security mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security
