As I mentioned on the call today, I don't know the exact revision we're using on dxr.mozilla.org, but I use the clang 3.0 release to compile mozilla-central on a daily basis.
Cheers, -- Ehsan <http://ehsanakhgari.org/> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Lionel Dricot <[email protected]> wrote: > Le 04/01/12 21:47, Ehsan Akhgari a écrit : > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Christian Dywan <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > >> Am 04.01.2012 20:41, schrieb Ehsan Akhgari: > >>> Speaking of which, I don't know why you need to know any of this. The > >>> current setup in dxr.mozilla.org is a mess, and should not be relied > >> upon > >>> at all. For example, we probably want to use clang 3.0 (or whatever > >> future > >>> version of clang which can build mozilla-central in case we check > >> something > >>> in which triggers a clang bug which gets fixed post 3.0). > >> mozilla-central looks to be broken with the latest llvm and clang while > >> other source trees work reliably. > >> > >> I tried a revision slightly older than the one you gave for clang > >> earlier today and it suddenly started working, so it's no longer urgent > >> to know the exact version you used. Investigation on the actual problem > >> pending. > >> > > I build mozilla-central with clang 3.0 every day. > > > Could you be more precise and tell us the exact commits you are using > there? Afaik, clang advertise itself as 3.0 since older versions (like > the one on your server) and the breakage in clang only happened more > recently. > > Lionel > _______________________________________________ > dev-static-analysis mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-static-analysis > _______________________________________________ dev-static-analysis mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-static-analysis
