On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Chris Cleeland <[email protected]>wrote:
> > By any chance, did the bug have a symptom where the extents for indirect > calls weren't showing up? > Yes, I believe so. The first pass where it gets the list of matching files was working properly so it would know what files to list. But the second part where it grabs the extents was using the wrong condition and wouldn't get any results. So if you had a file with both direct and indirect calls it would appear to be fine but be missing all the indirect calls. And if you had a file with only indirect calls then it would show up in the list but with no hits appearing below it. -- James _______________________________________________ dev-static-analysis mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-static-analysis
