Eddy Nigg wrote: > I think that by committing every two weeks another CA to the public > comments period (or alternatively as you started to do, twice a one week > period) we can include and process potentially 26 CAs per year. This > should be sufficient by estimating the number of CAs which are more or > less ready and have information collection complete.
Unfortunately I think that that rate is too slow. The problem is that as we clear existing requests new requests come in, and if we don't process existing requests fast enough then the queue of unprocessed requests will continue to grow without limit. Instead of artificially throttling the rate at which we process requests, I'd rather take CAs into public discussion as soon as we have sufficient information to do so. In practice some CA requests will be relatively straightforward to evaluate, and some will be more complicated. If you or anyone else feel that we need more time to discuss a particular request, just tell me and I will extend the public discussion period for that request as needed. Frank -- Frank Hecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
