Frank Hecker: > Eddy Nigg wrote: >> As per your comment in >> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421946#c17 you state that >> no problematic >> practices associated with this CA, but I found that in section 2.4.1 >> domain validated wild cards are issued, which is listed in >> http://wiki.mozilla.org/CA:Problematic_Practices#Wildcard_DV_SSL_certificates >> > > > My understanding is that this root and it hierarchy at present are not > being used for DV certs, but Comodo could do so in future, per the > existing CPS. We went through the issue of Comodo DV certs on a previous > request; if you recall, my final determination was that the practices of > issuing wildcard DV certs and long-lived DV certs, though potentially > problematic, were not in my opinion sufficient to justify denying the > request. That's my position in this case as well.
My point was that Comodo does issue certificates according to the problematic practices listed in our document. Not only that, it does more than one of those practices. You stated in the bug however that Comodo doesn't issue certificates according to the "Problematic Practices"! I have no illusion about your expected decision since we went through this not long ago....just wanted to set the facts strait! -- Regards Signer: Eddy Nigg, StartCom Ltd. Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blog: https://blog.startcom.org _______________________________________________ dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
