>Ian G wrote, On 2009-01-04 16:01: >> On 4/1/09 21:32, Paul Hoffman wrote: >> >>> I propose that Mozilla form a new mailing list, >>> dev-policy-trustanchors. The topics for that list would include: >>> >>> - All new trust anchors being added to the Mozilla trust anchor pile >>> - Proposals for changes to the Mozilla trust anchor policy >>> - Complaints about particular participants in the current trust anchor pile >>> - Discussion of the UI aspects of the PKI in various Mozilla software >> >> I agree in principle. I would suggest "policy-ca" or "ca-policy" being >> anything in or around the CA policy, as that is the name of the thing. >> >> Comments: >> >> 1. I don't think the discussions here are anything to do with dev. >> 2. trustanchors seems a too precise term, and I would prefer to see >> it dropped (for liability reasons). >> 3. I would love to see real discussion of the UI aspects. I have no >> idea how to talk to those people, they should be here. >> 4. This topic is also about legal relationships. Calling it "policy" >> tends to sweep the liabilities under the carpet. > >There's no mozilla.policy hierarchy. So I'm searching for ideas for a >good hierarchy for these discussions. Here are some ideas. How about: > >mozilla.security.CA >mozilla.security.UI >mozilla.security.pki
+1 to .CA or .PKI, -1 to .UI. There is more to the security UI than PKIX, and there is much more to trust anchors than UI. _______________________________________________ dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
