That is a lot faster. I assume beautification happens on the whole file at once (hopefully in a WebWorker :)? For a concrete basis, I timed zimbra_combined.js (in parsemark) and it took 1x with the native Reflect.parse, so the 7x factor would definitely be noticeable. This is a pretty strong point on the 'keep' side.
(For fun, I also tried Epic Citadel (24MB of minified JS, unzipped) and it took 36 seconds!) ----- Original Message ----- > On 9/6/2013 9:46 AM, David Bruant wrote: > > How much better is Reflect.parse performance? > > Well I just ran a comparison and got about 7x faster > (https://gist.github.com/espadrine/3262696). It's a year old version of > esprima but I doubt the differential could be that much. > _______________________________________________ > dev-tech-js-engine-internals mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine-internals > _______________________________________________ dev-tech-js-engine-internals mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine-internals
