I'm really sorry, the mozilla-esr24 url should be:
https://github.com/loongsonhf/ionmonkey-mips
在 2014年2月19日星期三UTC+8下午3时00分41秒，[email protected]写道：
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> We are IonMonkey development team from Loongson Inc, China. We have been
>
> ported IonMonkey of Mozilla-esr24 to our Loongson 3A MIPS platform, which is
>
> available at github:
>
> https://github.com/loongsonhf/loongson-mozilla-central
>
> This job is finished, and IonMonkey works well at our Loongson 3A platform.
>
>
>
> Now we are porting IonMonkey to Loongson 3A on the latest mozilla-central
>
> code. The code is available at:
>
> https://github.com/loongsonhf/loongson-mozilla-central
>
> There are some bugs now, with 99% baseline and ion test cases passed,
>
> we are trying to solve as soon as possible.
>
>
>
> We planed to submit our code to Mozilla last year(Dec, 2013), and emailed to
>
> to Jan de Mooij about this. As Petar, Paul and Branislav from Imgtec began to
>
> submit patch at Mozilla's bugzilla, we think there can be a way to collaborate
>
> to accomplish this work.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Weizhenwei
>
>
>
>
>
> 在 2014年2月7日星期五UTC+8下午5时18分57秒，Jan de Mooij写道：
>
> > Hi,
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > There's a (Chinese) company working on MIPS support as well. Are they
>
> >
>
> > related to you in any way? If not, hopefully you will be able to
>
> >
>
> > collaborate; I sent them a link to this thread so that they can
>
> >
>
> > contact you.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Branislav Rankov
>
> >
>
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
>
> > > 1. Would you like to review the code while on GitHub, or only trough the
>
> >
>
> > > patches submitted to Bugzilla?
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Some of our teams use GitHub but we don't use it for
>
> >
>
> > Gecko/SpiderMonkey development, so Bugzilla would be easier for us.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > > 2. How large should the individual patches be?
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > As small as possible. It's usually easier to review many small patches
>
> >
>
> > than 1 big patch.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > > 3. How often should the patches be submitted? I guess this depends on
>
> >
>
> > > reviewer availability.
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > My current plan is to submit the code in 5 phases:
>
> >
>
> > > - Skeleton code and Assembler
>
> >
>
> > > - Baseline Compiler code
>
> >
>
> > > - IonMonkey code
>
> >
>
> > > - OdinMonkey code
>
> >
>
> > > - MIPS simulator
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > That's a reasonable plan I think and is definitely better than landing
>
> >
>
> > it all at once.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > > I can separate assembly parts from integration parts if you wish.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > That would be nice. I expect the assembly part to be pretty big, maybe
>
> >
>
> > Andreas or Brendan can review that and one of us can review the
>
> >
>
> > changes to the rest of the engine/JITs?
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > > I will follow the discussions here and will be available on #jsapi on IRC
>
> >
>
> > > during Europe daytime. My IRC nick is rankov.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Great, thanks.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Jan
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-js-engine-internals mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine-internals
