On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 1:45 AM, Anthony Ramine <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Le 11 mai 2016 à 08:36, Jim Blandy <[email protected]> a écrit : > > The SpiderMonkey engineers build the library separately from the rest of > Firefox all the time; the "JS shell" is the preferred development vehicle. > So we can trust that the stand-alone SM builds work. That means that the > difficulties are specific to the process of producing an SM-only tarball. > > That's not exactly true: the final target of the JS shell is an > executable, whereas we want a static library. That's not really what the SM > developers use and that's why we have issues, AFAIK. I think that shell executable is always linked against the static JS library: https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/file/1579b9e2e50f/js/src/shell/moz.build#l11 which matches the comments here: https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/file/1579b9e2e50f/js/src/moz.build#l609 _______________________________________________ dev-tech-js-engine-internals mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine-internals
