I don't think it has much to do with the actual size of the script or
any particular method inside.  The un-minimized script, which is about
twice as large in raw bytes and with equivalent complexity, passes
through 1.6r6 just fine.

I was hoping to fix whatever was wonky about my minimized JavaScript
rather than upgrading to pre-release 1.7 since I don't really have
easy control over the server that I'm running the script on.

On Nov 21, 6:05 am, Norris Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One change that went in since 1.6R6 was released is a fix 
> forhttps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393848.
>
> I'm assuming that you're writing because just using the pre-released
> 1.7 is not sufficient for your needs. If that's the case, you could
> try patching in the changes for that bug (there's a listing of the
> versions of the changed files at the bottom of the bug report) and see
> if that fixes the problem. Other than that I'd say wait for the
> release of 1.7.
>
> --Norris

_______________________________________________
dev-tech-js-engine-rhino mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine-rhino

Reply via email to