On Jan 16, 4:45 am, Marc Guillemot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Attila Szegedi wrote: > Failed: ../tests/ecma_3/Date/15.9.5.5.js: > Math.abs(Date.parse(now.toLocaleString()) - now.valueOf()) < 1000 = > false FAILED! expected: true > Failed: ../tests/js1_5/Regress/regress-58116.js: FAILED! expected: > Expected value '-120', Actual value '-60' > Failed: ../tests/js1_5/Regress/regress-89443.js: JavaScript errors: > Failed: ../tests/js1_5/Regress/regress-98901.js: JavaScript errors: > Failed: ../tests/js1_5/extensions/regress-226507.js: JavaScript errors: > ------------------------------- > > In fact I don't really care if these tests are excluded or not but it > would help if the tests that should pass could be up to date > (additionally a mechanism to detect tests that already pass even if they > are marked as excluded would be useful).
The test driver can help here (without resorting to grep) -- it emits the results in HTML format (easier to browse) and also in XML format (easier to postprocess). Running the suite with -f myfile.html will create two files -- myfile.html and myfile.html.xml containing data about what happened. You can run the excluded tests (alone) just by loading the list of tests to run using the -l switch (that's a lowercase "L"), as in -l @<skip-list-file>. -- David P. Caldwell http://www.inonit.com/ _______________________________________________ dev-tech-js-engine-rhino mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine-rhino
