When executing JavaScript from the shell (java -jar js.sh), there is a Context associated with the current thread. I have a custom Context that is my security / runaway script barrier, and I'd like to execute random user JavaScript inside this context. If I use MyContextFactory.call(), it reuses the existing standard Context instead of associating a new MyContext with the thread. In this situation, it would be nice to have a stack of contexts that could be pushed and popped appropriately.
Looking at the implementation of Context and ContextFactory, it seems as though the Context / Thread relationship is deliberately enforced. Calling MyContext.enter() does nothing, as does Context.call(new MyContextFactory(), ...). My question is, is this because no one has needed to nest mixed Context implementations in the same thread, or was this considered but thrown out due to some subtlety that isn't currently obvious? _______________________________________________ dev-tech-js-engine-rhino mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine-rhino
