On Oct 20, 1:44 pm, Marc Guillemot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Norris Boyd wrote: > > ... > > Which tests are you referring to? I run the tests that are shared with > > SpiderMonkey using org.mozilla.javascript.drivers.JsDriver, which has > > skip lists, seehttp://developer.mozilla.org/En/Running_the_Rhino_tests. > > Those tests all pass for me, although I need to resync to pull down > > any new tests that have been introduced on the SpiderMonkey side.
I checked in a new base.skip that skips the new failing tests from the SpiderMonkey side. I haven't tried to add in skipped tests that are now passing. > > > How are you running tests? Using > > org.mozilla.javascript.drivers.StandardTests? > > Exactly these tests. Running it with ant junit-all, I have most of the > time 98 failures (out of 6641 tests). I'll have to try running that way to see if I get similar failures. On the server with CruiseControl, > I have more failures but I guess that this is only because it is a bit > more slow. This is made with the latest js tests from CVS head. > > When I run ant jsdriver-run this fails as well, but no idea how much > failures occur then. > > If I compile and run the tests in testsrc/org/mozilla/javascript/tests > (which are not included in any Ant target) from my IDE, I have 14 errors > (12 of them in DoctestsTest). These all work for me run individually from Eclipse. There were some tests that failed when the entire org.mozilla.javascript.tests package was run, but I just checked in fixes for those problems. Can you send me a sample failure? > > Cheers, > Marc. > -- > Web:http://www.efficient-webtesting.com > Blog:http://mguillem.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ dev-tech-js-engine-rhino mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine-rhino
