On Dec 5, 4:22 am, Norris Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 4, 9:26 am, Thomas Kappler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I'm extending a Java class via the -extends argument to the debugger.
>
> Did you mean compiler instead of debugger?
Yes, sorry!
> > Is there a way to let the compiled method be of type void?
>
> You could define an interface
>
> interface Foo {
> public void myFunc();
> }
>
> and then compile the JavaScript with -implements Foo. I haven't tried
> it, but I think it will force Rhino to match the void return type in
> the interface.
That works, thanks. It's a bit cumbersome for my use case, but not too
bad.
I'm trying to write JUnit (Java) test cases in Javascript, importing
junit.framework.Assert and compiling with -extends
junit.framework.TestCase. So I have to declare every testFoo() method
in a corresponding interface, because the JUnit test runner picks up
only methods conforming to "public void testFoo".
Thomas
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-js-engine-rhino mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine-rhino
