Hi,
Is there a particular style of writing javascript objects that rhino
performs best with? For example, I would prefer to write JS like the
first script example below. Does it matter how you write the JS?
In addition (sanity check...), say the script below
- was compiled (compileReader) in a servlet's doGet and cached for
subsequent use.
- the script is combined with a script compiled in the servlet's init
method.
- then, create a NativeObject and give it your request and response
objects as properties which is a passed as the args of a callMethod.
e.g.
// in a doGet method
Scriptable scope = context.newObject(sharedScope);
scope.setPrototype(sharedScope);
scope.setParentScope(null);
// create a new compiled script or get the cached version
Script script = getScript(context, scriptRes);
NativeObject result = (NativeObject)script.exec(context, scope);
NativeObject params = new NativeObject();
params.put("request", params, req);
params.put("response", params, resp);
Object[] args = {params};
NativeObject doGet = (NativeObject)ScriptableObject.callMethod(result,
req.getMethod(), args);
Is the above java and the first script below threadsafe in a servlet
type of interaction?
Preferred example script:
(function() {
var privateFunc = function(request, response) {
...
}
return {
GET: function(params) {
var request = params.request;
var response = params. response;
privateFunc(request, response);
...
}
}
})();
or should you write your functions like:
function GET() {
}
or
var GET = function() {
}
or
var Obj = {
GET: function() {
}
}
etc...
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-js-engine-rhino mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine-rhino
