hmm
i think in 1.6RC7 we just have the opposite that those things are not
catched..
But i could be wrong here need to check this
johan
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:38, Marc Guillemot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when for instance a NullPointerException occurs in method foo of my host
> object in a JS code like this one
>
> try
> {
> ...
> myHostObject.foo()
> ...
> }
> catch (e)
> {
> // do something
> }
>
> the try/catch block will catch it and I won't see that there is a
> problem in the Java code of my host object.
>
> It seems to me that it would make sense if users could have the
> possibility to configure Rhino to have "Java exceptions" catch in
> try/catch block or not. In our case (HtmlUnit) this would allow us to
> faster find errors in our host objects.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Cheers,
> Marc.
> --
> Web: http://www.efficient-webtesting.com
> Blog: http://mguillem.wordpress.com
> _______________________________________________
> dev-tech-js-engine-rhino mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine-rhino
>
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-js-engine-rhino mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine-rhino
