On Feb 7, 10:02 am, "David Parks" <[email protected]> wrote: > Quick question: If a script makes a call to a java method that I have > introduced with scope.put or with defineClass() and that method returns a > reference to another java object which isn't otherwise in the scope chain of > that script, what would the result be? > > Would the script be able to call all public methods of the returned object? > Would it only be able to call jsGet/jsSet/jsFunction methods? Is this > scenario simply invalid? > > Thanks! > David
If the returned Java object implements a JavaScript object through defineClass, then the process of calling defineClass on it will create a set of JavaScript objects that will have references to the scope passed to the defineClass call. If you use those objects in another scope, it can have a few odd behaviors that most people won't notice because it will refer to a different Function.prototype, for instance. Can you just use plain old Java objects instead of using defineClass? Those are easier to write and understand... --Norris _______________________________________________ dev-tech-js-engine-rhino mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine-rhino
