You wouldn't have that problem -- I don't work with people who make
personal attacks.

On Sep 8, 2:37 pm, Emilian Bold <[email protected]> wrote:
> You must be really fun to work with...
>
> --emi
>
> On Sep 8, 2009, at 9:18 PM, mckyj57 wrote:
>
> > And now you have validated my rant. There is no way for someone with
> > no working knowledge of Java to use this application. You may think
> > this is a good thing -- why I wouldn't know. It would seem to me that
> > providing installation information might be of some priority. But with
> > Java apps, I have not found it. Every time, one has to modify
> > something or another or add some obscure path to some environment
> > variable.
>
> > My initial attempt to change CLASSPATH, the thing I remembered you
> > typically had to do, didn't work. After playing with it awhile, I have
> > it running. But not due to any example that was provided, just trial
> > and error. Something completely forgotten quickly, I am sure, as I
> > will not use Java again any time soon.
>
> > Applications in almost all other areas, C, C++, Perl, even Python
> > nowadays, have a typical "./configure; make; make test; make install"
> > path with a man page and an application. It would seem to me that Java
> > applications would be well served to provide that type of top-to-
> > bottom installation.
>
> > I now have it running, but it has several other things which are
> > pretty strange about it, like insisting it know about every function
> > ahead of time (i.e. strict checking). There is no "man rhino", of
> > course, so you can't easily find any command options on how to disable
> > it with a switch. It would be a long search through bizarrely-
> > structured documentation. So as usual, I will put the incantation in a
> > shell script that I feel should have been provided by the application
> > itself. And if I find an alternative, I will probably avoid using this
> > application because it is in Java, and it is obtuse. Upgrading will be
> > something done completely from memory of course, or maintained in my
> > own logs, as there is no INSTALL or UPGRADE file.
>
> > I probably would have avoided this completely once I saw it was in
> > Java but I had hope that a project hosted by Mozilla might not have
> > the usual Java obtuseness. I am sorry I am wrong.
>
> > On Sep 8, 1:34 pm, Emilian Bold <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> For you I think these lines are the most important in my email:
>
> >>> [...]
> >>> Note: You might also want to read about the Java 
> >>> classpathhttp://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/tooldocs/windows/classpath.html
> >>> PS: [...] Learning a bit about Java might also help with your
> >>> frustrations.
>
> >> --emi
>
> >> On Sep 8, 2009, at 8:20 PM, mckyj57 wrote:
>
> >>> On Sep 8, 12:49 pm, Emilian Bold <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>> You go here:http://www.mozilla.org/rhino/
>
> >>>> See the BIG downloads link:http://www.mozilla.org/rhino/download.html
>
> >>>> You get the zip.
>
> >>>> You go back.
>
> >>>> You see the BIG documentation 
> >>>> link:https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Rhino_documentation
>
> >>> Yes, I sure did. But is there any installation info? No, there is  
> >>> not.
>
> >>>> You see
>
> >>>> "Rhino Shell
> >>>> Interactive or batch execution of scripts."
>
> >>> Yes, I sure did. But is there any installation info? No, there is  
> >>> not.
>
> >>>> That looks easy enough. It takes you 
> >>>> here:https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Rhino_Shell
>
> >>>> where you see how to execute the shell.
>
> >>> You do? I see:
>
> >>> java org.mozilla.javascript.tools.shell.Main [options] script-
> >>> filename-
> >>> or-url [script-arguments]
>
> >>> I do that, but no dice. Now I am not stupid enough to believe that  
> >>> it
> >>> is built into my Java, but how do you make that operate? Is it as
> >>> simple as copying js-14.jar to /usr/share/java? Or what?
>
> >>>> If you want to embed, you have a nice 
> >>>> tutorial:http://www.mozilla.org/rhino/tutorial.html
>
> >>>> Note: You might also want to read about the Java 
> >>>> classpathhttp://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/tooldocs/windows/classpath.html
>
> >>>> I would say that all in all everything is pretty clear, INSTALL  
> >>>> file
> >>>> or not.
>
> >>>> PS: You must be kidding with your rant. Learning a bit about Java
> >>>> might also help with your frustrations.
>
> >>> I don't want to learn about Java. I want to use a Java application.
>
> >>> There is no installation information. Searching on install and
> >>> installation in this group
> >>> yields no hits. Searching for "rhino installation" yields nothing on
> >>> the web.
>
> >>>> --emi
>
> >>>> On Sep 8, 2009, at 7:34 PM, mckyj57 wrote:
>
> >>>>> In downloading and inspecting Rhino from mozilla.com, I see no
> >>>>> documentation regarding installation. Going to the web site, I see
> >>>>> no
> >>>>> section on installation. There is no INSTALL or README file. The
> >>>>> index.html in the javadoc/ directory has no mention of  
> >>>>> installation.
>
> >>>>> How is one to use this tool to do something as simple as syntax-
> >>>>> checking
> >>>>> a script segment in an editor. For instance, with vim and perl you
> >>>>> can
> >>>>> highlight a code segment and do:
>
> >>>>>   !perl -wc
>
> >>>>> I simply want to be able to do that for Javascript to catch those
> >>>>> stupid
> >>>>> syntax errors you are bound to have from so many levels of  
> >>>>> bracket.
>
> >>>>> (Yes, I know about syntax coloring and definitions. I want more.)
>
> >>>>> P.S. At the risk of alienating people here, I will speak my two
> >>>>> cents.
> >>>>> This is not the first time I have had this problem with an
> >>>>> application written in Java. To my mind this is one of the  
> >>>>> constant
> >>>>> lacks in Java-based applications. There is rarely an installation
> >>>>> nor a regular command line script available for simple use. What  
> >>>>> is
> >>>>> the deal? Is there some sort of initiation that Java people want  
> >>>>> to
> >>>>> wreak on the world? Are you not deemed worthy enough to use Java
> >>>>> apps if you haven't gone through some rite of passage? I am not
> >>>>> surprised at the lack of traction Java has, based on this
> >>>>> unfriendliness.
>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Mickey
>
> >>>>> I don't want to get to the end of my life and find I have just
> >>>>> lived the length of it. I want to have lived the width of it as
> >>>>> well. -- Diane Ackerman
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> dev-tech-js-engine-rhino mailing list
> >>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine-rhino
>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> dev-tech-js-engine-rhino mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>>https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine-rhino
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > dev-tech-js-engine-rhino mailing list
> > [email protected]
> >https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine-rhino

_______________________________________________
dev-tech-js-engine-rhino mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine-rhino

Reply via email to