Count me in as well. Jarek
2010/1/18 Rapha <rspe...@gmail.com> > I like the idea. Are you thinking of the 1.1 spec ( > http://wiki.commonjs.org/wiki/Modules/1.1 ) ? > > Raphael > > On Jan 17, 1:35 pm, Attila Szegedi <szege...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Folks, > > > > I'm contemplating adding CommonJS Modules implementation to Rhino > codebase proper. I'd create org.mozilla.javascript.commonjs package to hold > it, and we could have a method similar to initStandardObjects(), i.e. > initCommonJs() that'd initialize it - basically install a require() function > with the expected semantics in the top-level scope. I want leave some of its > aspects - most notably lookup of the module script - pluggable, defined by > interfaces in the org.mozilla.javascript.commonjs package, so that specific > embeddings of Rhino (JS app servers) can install their own module resolver > logic. I'd provide a default implementation for the shell too. > > > > As I foresee that several Rhino-based JS products will adopt CommonJS in > the near future, it seems desirable to not have all of them reinvent the > wheel (even though some already did, I'm guilty of coding my own require() > too in the next-gen version of my company's server-side JS enviroment...). > > > > Opinions? > > > > Attila. > > _______________________________________________ > dev-tech-js-engine-rhino mailing list > dev-tech-js-engine-rhino@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine-rhino > -- Bloguje się tutaj http://primitive.jogger.pl A czatuje tutaj jpa...@jabber.gda.pl _______________________________________________ dev-tech-js-engine-rhino mailing list dev-tech-js-engine-rhino@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine-rhino
