On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, fantasai wrote: > > According to bz, the NS (not ns) prefix on things like > nsIDOMNSDocumentStyle is for labelling our extensions to the official > W3C DOM. My question is, should that include WHATWG specs as well?
Probably doesn't make any practical difference since most WHATWG extensions that get implemented start off as non-standard vendor-specific extensions, get specced in WHATWG specs, then eventually end up being W3C official features. For sanity's sake I'd recommend separating the interface name from the source of the feature and not worrying about it. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' _______________________________________________ dev-tech-layout mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-layout
