In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Boris Zbarsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Henri Sivonen wrote: > >> What if there is no frame? > > > > But there are for (at least non-SVG) elements that are being rendered, > > right? > > Yes. Good. > A visibility:hidden frame can have descendants that render. OK. I guess I'll drop the visibility: hidden; test. > > I am assuming it always exists for elements that have a defined and > > non-null contentDocument property and are neither display: none; nor > > visibility: hidden;. > > > > Is that a wrong assumption? > > Yes. HTML iframes that are kids of an SVG element will have a defined and > non-null contentDocument, and may have any values of display and visibility. OK, but I am not walking into SVG subtrees anyway. > >>> Does an element even have a primary nsIFrame if it has display: none;? > >> No. > > > > That's a sufficient test then? > > Test for what? For testing that the element and the subtree is being rendered (excluding cases that have SVG ancestry). -- Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hsivonen.iki.fi/ _______________________________________________ dev-tech-layout mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-layout
