Thank you for your reply, Boris. > byang wrote: > > Could you please tell me what do you mean by saying "views are slated > > to disapperar and widgets"? > > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=337801andhttps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=352093
The two bugs are just some future works here. I think. And is there any work began for this area? > > > Could you please give me more hint and I > > think this will make my code reading easy. > > In terms of code reading, all that's really relevant is that given any frame > F, > either F itself or some ancestor of F (including cross-document ancestors!) > has > a view. Given any view V, either V itself or some ancestor of V has a widget. You mean, a view may not has a widget and a frame may not has a view, am I right? And what if a frame has some ancestor frame which has a view? And view? Thank you for your kindly help, thanks! Regards! Bo _______________________________________________ dev-tech-layout mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-layout
