> Instead of saying this, the trend in all standards-related lists is to > ask you to provide either 1) detailed explanation of "uses cases" or > descriptions of various situations why you want this 2) a page (a URL) > or more that uses this functionality 3) the JS code that implements > this, so you might want to expand this paragraph in advance. > > And you should be prepared to answer questions like, when should > transitionsend occurs in the following situation: > > |----|----| > |--|--|--|--| > > (a transitionend triggers yet another transition) > > or in general, what makes a "transitionsend" set? a CSS rule block > (examples would certainly help here)? How are the JS libraries you > mentioned designed?
Thanks for pointing this out. I will take these points into account. > In general, I don't think you need to compose this e-mail here, and if > what I am saying here is making you hesitate to send out this mail then > you should really just send this to www-style right away. (Having this > discussed there is usually better than having this discussed here, not > to mention that implementations differ). Sending it to www-style is my original intention. However, before doing this I first wanted to ask (style-system) programmers for feedback about whether my expected performance gain (by not interrupting the whole property transition process for every attached 'transitionend' listener) will turn out to be true or not. I'd just implement the 'transitionsend' event by myself in order to do some benchmarking, but I have no glue about C++. > You might want to file feature requests on Bugzilla, including the > WebKit one, too. Good point! :peter _______________________________________________ dev-tech-layout mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-layout
