On Monday 2013-03-18 22:27 -0400, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 3/18/13 7:07 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > >This would be replaced with what I propose in item (A) in that message, > >which is essentially the miniflush concept > > At first glance this seems reasonable. Especially if we can > continue to avoid having to do any extra work here if there are no > transitions around. Can we?
Hmmm. Off the top of my head I can't think of a way to do that other than having a boolean saying whether any nodes have 'transition-duration' or 'transition-delay' on them. That said, we might be able to scope this to subtrees by having a bit on style contexts saying whether a style context or any of its descendants has one of those properties set. -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂 _______________________________________________ dev-tech-layout mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-layout
