Yeah, it's specced:
https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/tables.html#attr-tdth-rowspan

Opened bug with same text here:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1441710


I think the reasoning is in the email? Is there something more specific
you're looking for?

Thanks,

-Manish Goregaokar

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 3:08 PM, Emilio Cobos Álvarez <emi...@crisal.io>
wrote:

> Hi Manish,
>
> Can you open / link to a bug for this work?
>
> Also, is it on the spec? If so, probably spec issues need to be filed if
> we really want it to get dropped?
>
> A bit of reasoning (I do know why from IRC, but you should probably
> explain) about why would be helpful, too.
>
> It is indeed unfortunate that Blink added support for this just a month
> before you intend to remove it, but probably as long as they're willing to
> not ship it is fine.
>
> Thanks,
>
>  -- Emilio
>
>
> On 02/27/2018 11:31 PM, Manish Goregaokar wrote:
>
>> (Of course, this is contingent on the Chrome people agreeing to unship
>> this
>> as well)
>>
>> -Manish Goregaokar
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 2:28 PM, Manish Goregaokar <manishsm...@gmail.com
>> >
>> wrote:
>>
>> Gecko (and previously Presto) support setting `rowspan=0` in
>>> non-quirksmode documents to mean "up to the end of the rowgroup" (for
>>> rows
>>> not within rowgroups, this means that it spans up to the next rowgroup or
>>> the end of the table). It is equivalent to setting rowspan to a very
>>> large
>>> number.
>>>
>>> colspan=0 does not do this[1]
>>>
>>> Chrome/Blink very recently added support[2], but it's still in Canary,
>>> and
>>> I'd like to remove it from both browsers and the spec before it hits
>>> release.
>>>
>>> You can already achieve this behavior with `rowspan=<large number>`, and
>>> we should encourage developers to use Grid anyway, so I don't see much
>>> value in having this feature in and of itself. Given that it was only
>>> supported by one browser (us) for so many years, it's questionable
>>> whether
>>> it's used enough on the Web for it to be something we must keep for
>>> compat
>>> reasons.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>>   [1]: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1241840
>>>   [2]: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=180722
>>>
>>>
>>> -Manish Goregaokar
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>> dev-tech-layout mailing list
>> dev-tech-layout@lists.mozilla.org
>> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-layout
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> dev-tech-layout mailing list
> dev-tech-layout@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-layout
>
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-layout mailing list
dev-tech-layout@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-layout

Reply via email to