Mark Smith wrote:
Given the relatively small size of all of the LDAP code, I don't see a
big advantage in the "one repository per SDK" solution. It seems like
less overhead and simpler to me to have one repository for all of the
LDAP SDKs. There may be a technical (hg) or philosophical reason to
have separate repos that I am not aware of though.
(for me)
The main reason is technical: to be able to handle the c-sdk separately.
But, if that doesn't matter (anymore), I assume a directory repo with
all the sdks would be fine.
Also, I am not in favor of a solution that will cause two copies of the
code to be maintained (or stored) in two different places.
I concurr.
Pulling from the same repository but using a tag to
provide stability to consumers like TBird and SeaMonkey is my
preference. I assume that is what is still done for NSS and NSPR?
Yes, and for cvs c-sdk too ;-)
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-ldap mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-ldap
