hummm, so a manually added timeout would do the trick , right ?! Anyways, if it is not implemented yet so there might be a reason/drawback ?
thanks On 4/27/07, Christian Biesinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Antonio Gomes wrote: > > very similar to bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=265828, > > but > > we are running over the trunk, libxul, a modified minimal profile build. > > that bug is not about a lost network connection though. It is about > (basically) a timeout, as far as I can tell, except that Necko's HTTP > code never does timeouts. Therefore you are not notified about anything, > as the networking layer just assumes that there will be more data > eventually. > > > -- > All the world's a stage, > And all the men and women merely players: > They have their exits and their entrances; > And one man in his time plays many parts, [...] --W. Shakespeare > -- --Antonio Gomes _______________________________________________ dev-tech-network mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-network
