On 6/11/07, Gervase Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nickolay Ponomarev wrote: > > You keep saying this, but I seem to have missed the discussion where > > it was decided and the page/bug describing rationale for this change. > > Care to give a link? > > We are currently working out exactly what to do. A related bug is: > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=327181 > Thanks.
> > There are multiple sites I have to use, that have problems with the > > certificate, so I don't believe it's a very bright idea to just > > disallow access to such sites. > > How do you suggest that the average Firefox user tells the difference > between "a site which has problems with its certificate", and a phishing > attempt? > Unless we have evidence that users click through our antiphishing warning for phishing sites, I'd use a similar (dismissable) warning with simple wording. Nickolay _______________________________________________ dev-tech-network mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-network
