On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Jason Duell <[email protected]> wrote: >> When the cache is found to be corrupt, could the whole directory be >> renamed, a new cache created and >> the old one be deleted in the background later? > That's how it's been done for a long time. We hit a speedbump where the > renaming of the directory itself takes a long time on NTFS for large > directories, but that's hopefully completely fixed now.
So it sounds like the slowdown issues are all fixed? Are there any other reasons why we would want to decrease the size? -christian _______________________________________________ dev-tech-network mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-network
