All, 

I've been getting pings from some significant content providers
interested in participating in an experiment where servers could opt-in
via hints on uri masks to receiving some form of streamlined http
requests. We don't normally do these kinds of things (see below) because
they could cause compatibility or flexibility problems, but having the
server signal that's cool with them (along with the scope of that
decision and some rules around how long that hint lasts) resolves a lot
of those issues and can result in better networking performance.

examples:
 * no cookies for /images/* please
 * minimal headers are fine (no accept-*)
 * my server can handle large numbers of parallel connections (which btw
doesn't mean its always the right thing to do, but the server's voice is
impt)
 * minimal user-agent header is fine (e.g. "user-agent: firefox:14.0")
 * /images/ works with http pipelines really well (static, small, etc..)
 etc..

There is a draft for one potential framework here:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-http-browser-hints-03 

If you've got thoughts on why this would be a bad idea, or thoughts for
other knobs I'd love to hear them. please read the draft first, of
course.

Also, my apologies for crossposting this if that kind of thing bothers
you. I reserve it for rare occasions I assure you.

-Patrick




_______________________________________________
dev-tech-network mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-network

Reply via email to