I don't really have an opinion on this. But I should probably adjust my CSP comment and say that it seems like a nasty hack to add non-CSP policies to the CSP observers.
Of course, had we had bug 694101, this would probably have been much easier ;-) / Jonas On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Jason Duell <[email protected]> wrote: > In > > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=780087 > > we'll be blocking B2G app's traffic if they exceed a quota, and/or only > allow it if the phone is in a wifi network, etc. > > Honza came up with the idea of adding a CSP policy to do this monitoring, > but sicking comments on IRC that "putting it in the CSP code sounds like a > scary hack though given that it's not CSP code at all". So perhaps CSP is a > bad place for it. > > We could use http-on-modify-request, but that only fires for HTTP requests. > > I'm currently thinking we might want to add a new nsIObserverService > notification that's issued for "necko channel for app AppID about to connect > on network interface FOO". How does that sound? Am I missing some other > clever way of doing this? > > Jason > _______________________________________________ dev-tech-network mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-network
