I think mark has confirmed this was a missed diagnosis On Aug 28, 2013 6:08 AM, "Honza Bambas" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 8/22/2013 9:17 AM, Mark Hammond wrote: > >> What I believe is happening is that this speculative connection is being >> reused for the connection made by the "anonymous" docShell, and as a result >> mCaps on the transport isn't getting the NS_HTTP_LOAD_ANONYMOUS flag, which >> in turn means the nsNSSSocketInfo for the request doesn't get the >> nsISocketProvider::ANONYMOUS_**CONNECT flag, which in turn doesn't >> suppress the SSL certificate prompt for the request. >> > > This is actually bad. The non-anonymous connection should not be used for > anonymous usage. If that happens, that something is wrong. > > Anon and non-anon connections have separete pools. If those can > exchanged, it is a bug. > > -hb- > ______________________________**_________________ > dev-tech-network mailing list > dev-tech-network@lists.**mozilla.org <[email protected]> > https://lists.mozilla.org/**listinfo/dev-tech-network<https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-network> > _______________________________________________ dev-tech-network mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-network
