I actually have the very same problem, and also the problem of passing
in an array as a single parameter, and the problem of exposing a member
field as an array.
David
Murilo Camões Perrone wrote:
In my XPCOM component, I must use an single-parameter "byte array" ,
because I must reproduce an existent COM interface whose methods use
managed arrays (sngle-parameter arrays are present on those interfaces).
The XPIDL language defines that, for conventional arrays, an extra
parameter indicating the array length should be used, and this is a
problem for me. Exemple:
In XPIDL I can define:
void BinaryStringToByteArray ( in string BinaryString, _out unsigned
long length, [array, size_is (length), retval] out octet data_ );
but I need this:
_byte[]_ BinaryStringToByteArray ( in string BinaryString );
I need to use a byte[] compatible with Java and JavaScript native byte
arrays.
Currently the only solution I found is to use the wrappedJSObject
property of an JavaScript defined component, but this does only work if
the XPCom client is JavaScript too...
Any ideas ?
------
Murilo Perrone
CertiSign
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-xpcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-xpcom
