On 17/08/12 08:44, Jonas Sicking wrote: > I agree that we need a default extension, and while I'm sure there are > better ones, I definitely like .wpk better than .apppkg
Agreed on that. Although I think that we could also consider a double-barrelled extension - .wpk.zip. This shows it's a zip file and allows normal tools to work on it more easily, but also shows it's a web package. Gerv _______________________________________________ dev-webapps mailing list dev-webapps@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-webapps
