My apologies. I looked again and it was just the one test.
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 4:32 PM, John Vines <[email protected]> wrote: > InMemoryMapTest isn't really dependent on the site, as it will fall back on > defaults if not available. So I'm not concerned about that one. What was > the other test? > > On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 4:27 PM, David Medinets > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> The tests passed. The chance that someone has an accumulo-site.xml on >> their classpath while compiling is admittedly small. It struck me as >> odd that only two of the tests gave this warning. My real concern is >> that the tests are passing without testing the correct situation. >> >> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 3:56 PM, John Vines <[email protected]> wrote: >> > This is a side effect of moving the configurations into the examples I >> > think. The real question is are there any issues, because those are just >> > WARNings. Did it break the test? >> > >> > John >> > >> > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:30 PM, David Medinets >> > <[email protected]>wrote: >> > >> >> I did not expect one of the tests to be looking for the site >> >> configuration file. When compiling Accumulo for the first time, this >> >> configuration file can't exist ... can it? >> >> >> >> Running org.apache.accumulo.server.tabletserver.InMemoryMapTest >> >> 12/07/13 01:56:09 WARN conf.SiteConfiguration: accumulo-site.xml not >> >> found on classpath >> >> 12/07/13 01:56:09 WARN util.NativeCodeLoader: Unable to load >> >> native-hadoop library for your platform... using builtin-java classes >> >> where applicable >> >> >>
