-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6861/#review10917
-----------------------------------------------------------



/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/security/Authorizations.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/6861/#comment23449>

    In some cases, the loss of this check, may result in some typos in the 
authorization to pass through, instead of failing early. I don't see that this 
is too big of a problem, though. All characters are now valid in authorization 
tokens.



/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/security/ColumnVisibility.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/6861/#comment23450>

    I strongly recommend using the double-quote, if you're going to allow 
quoting. As demonstrated in this comment alone, the single quote has multiple 
purposes. You'll probably get less conflict if you rely on double-quote as the 
quote character.


- Christopher Tubbs


On Aug. 30, 2012, 8:59 p.m., kturner wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/6861/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 30, 2012, 8:59 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for accumulo.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> A patch for adding quoting to column visibility
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> /trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/security/Authorizations.java
>  1379035 
>   
> /trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/security/ColumnVisibility.java
>  1379035 
>   
> /trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/security/VisibilityEvaluator.java
>  1379035 
>   
> /trunk/core/src/test/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/security/ColumnVisibilityTest.java
>  1379035 
>   
> /trunk/core/src/test/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/security/VisibilityEvaluatorTest.java
>  1379035 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6861/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> kturner
> 
>

Reply via email to