emphatic +1 for moving to Git :)
On Sunday, October 14, 2012, Christopher Tubbs <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd almost prefer all patches to be submitted as a link to a GitHub > repo, but since our SCM is SVN natively, I'm not sure how well that > would work. It would certainly be ideal if we had a native Git repo > for Accumulo... is the one on apache.org writable, or just a read only > view of what's in svn? > > -- > Christopher L Tubbs II > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Drew Farris <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> In the past, when I've used JIRA and uploaded multiple versions of >> patches to the same issue, I've simply used the same filename, and >> JIRA took care of putting a strikethrough in the listings for the old >> version of the patch, indicating that they were available but should >> be ignored. >> >> These days, it simply greys the old patch versions out. It makes >> things a little less clear as to which patches should be applied to >> obtain the fix. >> >> There is some value in maintaining a patch history, but in many cases >> old patches should be trashed to make it clear which patch should be >> applied to obtain the fix. >> >> Any patch posted should contain the entire change for a given issue, >> as opposed to requiring individuals working the issue to apply >> multpile patches to obtain an update. >> >> Does this make sense, or does anyone think patches should be handled >> differently? >> >> Drew >
