On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Corey Nolet <cno...@texeltek.com> wrote: > Keith, > > I've been a huge fan of Instamo. I think it's genius! I don't want to > complicate things by back porting the MiniAccumuloCluster and I'm mostly > enjoying the deep dive into the codebase. Having the proxy supported in 1.4.* > is a huge win and the integration tests would help, but if you guys are > comfortable with using Mocks, I can still support bugs as they pop up.
I think users would really like the new feature, I am just worried about the potential for confusion. I the more organized we are now about what goes in 1.4.X releases, the more it will help us a year from now when we are still supporting 1.4.X on production systems. > > > On Apr 4, 2013, at 3:26 PM, Keith Turner wrote: > >> Thinking about the since tags a bit more, maybe the since tags should >> just contain the version that we released first? That would imply >> that maybe the since tags in 1.4.4 would say since 1.5.0? >> >> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Corey Nolet <cno...@texeltek.com> wrote: >>> The back porting of the proxy is pretty much complete. I have not submitted >>> the patch yet because I am not able to run any automated integration tests >>> without the mini Accumulo cluster. I've gotten pretty far with backporting >>> the Mini Accumulo Cluster and it would be massively useful to have the it >>> in v1.4 (if it works out well). Anyone against submitting a separate patch >>> for this when it's complete? >
