On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 2:54 PM, John Vines <[email protected]> wrote:
> What about CDH3U5+ and CDH4? They also require some specialized packaging > as well. > Maybe only Apache Hadoop should be supported by Apache Accumulo? Cloudera could package a downstream version of Accumulo that works w/ their downstream version of Hadoop if they wanted. > > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Christopher <[email protected]> wrote: > > > So, I have a process in place for releasing the tarballs, rpms, debs, > > jars, PDFs, etc. using the maven-release-plugin, that signs and seals > > everything and deploys to the staging repository for voting. I'm still > > polishing it before I commit it. > > > > However, I've not figured out the best way to generate and release the > > hadoop2 variants. They should be released with a classifier to > > indicate they are for hadoop2, if they are released, but our build > > isn't exactly set up to produce two artifacts per module, and neither > > are our scripts capable of dealing with artifacts with classifiers in > > them. > > > > My opinion is that we should release for Hadoop 1.0, but support > > building from source against 2.0. Since 2.0 is still beta, this seems > > acceptable to me, and we can try to do better support for packaging > > for 2.0 in Accumulo 1.6.0, with tickets such as ACCUMULO-210 and the > > like. > > > > -- > > Christopher L Tubbs II > > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Keith Turner <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 2:03 PM, John Vines <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> Yes > > >> > > > > > > Ok, I vaguely remember discussion of this on a ticket or in mailing > list. > > > Do you know the details? Is this caused by something hadoop is doing, > or > > > is it how we are using Hadoop? Can we change something in Accumulo to > > > avoid this? > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Keith Turner <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> > > >> > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 1:48 PM, John Vines <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > Has anyone put any thought into how we're going to release 1.5, > > >> > considering > > >> > > the special cases needed for the various hadoop releases? I'm not > > only > > >> > > talking about distributions, but also the jars released to > central. > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > Does compiling against Hadoop 1 result in Accumulo class files that > > will > > >> > not work w/ Hadoop 2? > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > -- > > >> > > Cheers > > >> > > ~John > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >
