Sure, that's still an option, but I don't think this particular incompatibility makes it necessary, does it?
-- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Adam Fuchs <afu...@apache.org> wrote: > We still have the option of putting out a separate build for 1.5.0 > compatibility with hadoop 2. Should we vote on that release separately? > Seems like it should be easy to add more binary packages that correspond to > the same source release, even after the initial vote. > > Adam > > > > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Keith Turner <ke...@deenlo.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Eric Newton <eric.new...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Ugh. While running the continuous ingest verify, yarn spit this out: >> > >> > Error: Found interface org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.Counter, but class was >> > expected >> > >> > This is preventing the reduce step from completing. >> > >> >> Could fix it in 1.5.1 >> >> I am starting to think that hadoop compat was so important, it should have >> been mostly completed before the feature freeze. >> >> >> > >> > -Eric >> > >>
