+1 with a big caveat that a branching strategy needs to be discussed.
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Michael Wall <mjw...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 but it is more than just changing tools. Have a discussion about a git > workflow and branching model. I have seen that be a point of frustration > for many projects making the switch. > On May 21, 2013 6:29 PM, "Benson Margulies" <bimargul...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Everything at Apache is a work in progress. Plenty of projects are using > > it. > > > > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com> wrote: > > > Looks like git support is available, but still a work in progress. See > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/ > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > >> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 6:05 PM, David Medinets > > >> <david.medin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > I thought we were constrained by apache's subversion repo? > > >> > > >> I'm not sure what we are constrained by. > > >> > > >> > > > >> > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 5:51 PM, John Vines <vi...@apache.org> > wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> +1 > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> > > >> wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >> > I'm sure this has been entertained before, I'm starting to think > > that > > >> >> > we should seriously consider switching to git, maybe sooner > (during > > >> >> > 1.6 development cycle?). > > >> >> > > > >> >> > -- > > >> >> > Christopher L Tubbs II > > >> >> > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > >
