Hi Christopher, That's an excellent observation, and something that is easy to verify and fix.
Is there anyone opposed to changing the Arch of the 1.4.3 RPM from amd64 to x86_64, if that is the problem here? Thanks, Andres On Jul 7, 2013 6:11 PM, "Christopher" <[email protected]> wrote: > The ARCH for the 1.4.3 RPM is amd64 instead of x86_64. I'm guessing > that's why you're seeing this problem. RPM will still install the > 1.4.3 RPM, but YUM doesn't like it. > > -- > Christopher L Tubbs II > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > > > On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 9:21 PM, Andres Danter <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I ran into an odd problem and was wondering if anyone could verify a > > possible issue. > > > > I tried setting up a local yum repository that contains only the RPM for > > Accumulo 1.4.3. I created a file in /etc/yum.repos.d called local.repo. > > It contains the following: > > > > [localrepo] > > name=localrepo > > baseurl=file:///var/www/html/localrepo > > enabled=1 > > gpgcheck=0 > > > > I placed the RPM in /var/www/html/localrepo/accumulo/ > > > > Then I ran the following command: > > > > createrepo /var/www/html/localrepo > > > > Then I ran the following: > > > > repoquery -q --repoid=localrepo -a > > > > Which returned nothing. It should have listed the Accumulo RPM. > > > > I then replaced the 1.4.3 RPM with the 1.5.0 RPM and ran the following > > command: > > > > createrepo --update /var/www/html/localrepo > > > > Then I ran: > > > > yum clean all > > > > Then I re-ran: > > > > repoquery -q --repoid=localrepo -a > > > > This time the command returned: > > > > accumulo-0:1.5.0-1.noarch > > > > I was even able to install the Accumulo 1.5.0 RPM using Yum. I was > unable > > to do that with the 1.4.3 RPM. > > > > So has anyone ever successfully set up a repository with the 1.4.3 RPM? > > Does anyone have any clue as to why one RPM is seen by Yum and the other > is > > not? I figured it has to do with the metadata that is created when the > RPM > > is built, but I don't have any insight beyond that. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Andres >
