On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Christopher <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think a week extension would be good for projects that are under > review, but I don't think it should be extended for development on > those features (except to address issues from the review). This would > also encourage people to push something potentially disruptive to > ReviewBoard instead of committing at the last minute and having to > revert it later. That would allow us to review stuff that has been > ready, but not committed because people have been busy finishing other > features for the feature freeze and haven't had time to review it yet. > > Just to make sure I'm reading this right: you're saying we include things that are in review board as of the original feature freeze date? And then they get pushed post-feature-freeze date once their reviews have iterated to acceptance? -- Sean
