Oh awesome, thanks for the confirmation that it actually went through, Billie. I have so much trouble figuring out how to distinguish message copies in gmail.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote: > Weird. I was seeing them go to [email protected]. > > But one of Bill Havanki's reviews that came directly to me is also going > to [email protected] > > > On 11/6/13, 4:04 PM, Billie Rinaldi wrote: > >> The one I got today was from Michael Berman and contained the text >> "created >> new review created so I get responses instead of Vines". >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 12:53 PM, John Vines <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> That was the original I submitted while Berman was at Strata. I asked him >>> to resubmit to he could manage the patch. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Billie Rinaldi <[email protected] >>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>> >>> I received the review via the dev list with subject "Re: Review Request >>>> 15245: ACCUMULO-1009 - add use of SSL for thrift comms (was >>>> https://reviews.apache.org/r/14972/)" at approximately 9:57 am ET. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Michael Berman <[email protected]> >>>> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> I recently posted a review for ACCUMULO-1009 ( >>>>> https://reviews.apache.org/r/15245/), and I added the accumulo group >>>>> >>>> as >>> >>>> a >>>> >>>>> reviewer, but that email went to the old incubator list (as noted by >>>>> others). It doesn't look to me like it came through to the real dev >>>>> list...is there something special I have to do to get reviews posted >>>>> >>>> here? >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>
