On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 1/2/14, 2:16 PM, Keith Turner wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Christopher <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I agree with Keith. Thanks for summarizing, Sean. >>> >>> I also favor option #2 for all existing versions, up through 1.6.0. >>> >> >> What are your thoughts on reverting close() in 1.7.0-SNAPSHOT? > > > IMO, I think a full revert makes sense, and then we can fully hash out the > new API without influence of what was already there. If we end up > "re-adding" the changes, so be it, but it seems very unlikely that we'd end > up with the same final approach. [snip]
+1
