On 2/20/14, 10:23 AM, Keith Turner wrote:
>> There have been a lot of good ideas mentioned. What do we want to do for
>>>1.5.1? I would not be opposed to waiting a few days on the 1.5.1 release
>>>if someone wants to create nice user friendly release notes. Or for
>>>1.5.1
>>>we could just continue to do what was done for 1.4.X releases. For
>>>1.6.0
>>>I think we should create a user friendly summary of whats important in
>>>the
>>>release.
>>>
>>>
>>I'd prefer to not hold up 1.5.1 for something like this, and would rather
>>just follow suite with 1.4. By this, you mean having all CHANGES from 1.4.X
>>and 1.5.0 in addition to the 1.5.1 changes, correct? Is this acceptable to
>>everyone? I know there were other suggestions made and don't want to
>>prematurely squash discussion.
>>
>
>I was thinking taking the 1.5.0 changes file and adding the 1.5.1 stuff to
>it. If we did anything w/ 1.4, we would would only want to take 1.4.0
>changes and add that after 1.5.0. Not all changes in 1.4.[1.2.3.4] are in
>1.5 series and any changes that are in both are hopefully marked properly
>in jira and already in the 1.5.X list. Since the 1.4.0 changes were not
>listed in 1.5.0, I am not neutral on adding that in 1.5.1.
>
s/not neutral/not not neutral/
Because that clarification makes things simpler :P
I'm still unsure if 1.5.0 did not contain 1.4 changes intentionally or
by omission. I feel like Christopher had said that was unintentional,
but I'm not sure anymore. I'm not super opinionated on whether or not
1.5 contains 1.4 changes. I can see arguments for and against doing it
and am fine seeing it either way.
Overall, I'd rather just get to some consensus on the subject.
