Yeah, I guess I was just confused, because I expected the hash provided in the message to point to the HEAD commit in the tag, not something specific to the tag's own blob.
-- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:04 PM, John Vines <[email protected]> wrote: > Deleting the rc tag? > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Christopher <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Nevermind and disregard. I'm mistaken. We voted on 3478f71a as >> 1.5.1-rc3... this tag is correct. >> >> However, I am confused about the previous push delete: >> "Updated Tags: refs/tags/1.5.1-rc3 [deleted] c485b41f7" >> >> -- >> Christopher L Tubbs II >> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Christopher <[email protected]> wrote: >> > This does not look correct. The 1.5.1 tag should have been the GPG >> > signed one that Josh was going to create from the 1.5.1-rc3 >> > (c485b41f7). This is a different SHA1 entirely. >> > >> > -- >> > Christopher L Tubbs II >> > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:42 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Repository: accumulo >> >> Updated Tags: refs/tags/1.5.1 [created] 6ce236826 >>
