> On March 31, 2014, 4:13 p.m., kturner wrote: > > Josh, after I converted your doc to markdown I should have sent it to you > > and let you post it to RB. I was so excited about experimenting w/ > > reviewing design docs on RB that I did not really think that part through. > > Josh, what do you think about starting a new review on RB w/ the next > > iteration of the document? You could start it and all subsequent versions > > could go there. We can link to both on the ticket. > > > > What do people think of reviewing design docs this way so far? I really > > like it. Much better than mailing list or jira comments.
Haha, yes I noticed that I couldn't actually close out the issues that were opened. I'll pull a fresh copy down to upload and try to capture the comments that are still open on this version. I would agree with you that it's nice, but RB just sat for 5 minutes telling me it failed to post my comment :) - Josh ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19790/#review39049 ----------------------------------------------------------- On March 28, 2014, 5:54 p.m., kturner wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/19790/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated March 28, 2014, 5:54 p.m.) > > > Review request for accumulo. > > > Bugs: ACCUMULO-378 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-378 > > > Repository: accumulo > > > Description > ------- > > ACCUMULO-378 Design document. Posting for review here, not meant for commit. > Final version of document should be posted on issue. > > > Diffs > ----- > > docs/src/main/resources/design/ACCUMULO-378-design.mdtext PRE-CREATION > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19790/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > kturner > >
