+1 ditto on what's been said

Not sure on how "aggressive" it would be to call hadoop1 deprecated for 1.6.0, but I wouldn't mind seeing that happen. Can certainly poll the user list for input. We've already "encouraged" hadoop2 by switching the build profiles for 1.6, perhaps it's not unreasonable to call it deprecated too.

On 4/4/14, 2:20 PM, Ravi Mutyala wrote:
+1 for dropping support for hadoop1 in future versions. +1 to call it
deprecated for Hadoop 1. It might be to good option to get info from user
list if anyone is going to use 1.6 on Hadoop1.

Thanks


On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Mike Drob <[email protected]> wrote:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10690

Deprecated in 0.98, dropped in 1.0


On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> wrote:

Mike, as of which version is HBase dropping?

I wouldn't want to do this in 1.6.x. Presumably that would mean if we
drop
it in the next version, we'd still be supporting Hadoop 1 until both 1.5
and 1.6 have been EOLd?

-Sean


On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Mike Drob <[email protected]> wrote:

HBase has started to drop hadoop 1 support already.


On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:54 AM, John Vines <[email protected]> wrote:

This is something that crossed my mind recently. Hadoop 2 is solidly
moving
forward and, as someone who does not actively follow the hadoop
community,
hadoop 1 is slowing down. Adoption for hadoop2 is on the rise and
with
that
I'm starting to wonder whether it's worth the code complexity to
support
both versions, particularly attempting to harness new features.

What is the communities thought on this, maybe for 1.7 or maybe for
future
releases?





--
Sean



Reply via email to