+1

I did a little more poking at 1.6.1 and it looks good.  Thanks Corey and
Josh for putting these releases together.

Sigs and hashes for bin.tar.gz and src.tar.gz look good
Successfully ran mutslam[1] against 1.6.1 rc1, using staging repo.
Ci w/ Agitation verify ran successfully.   Env hadoop 2.3.0, ZK 3.4.5,
Centos 6, 20 node EC2.  17B ingested.

[1]: https://github.com/keith-turner/mutslam

On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Corey Nolet <cjno...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Devs,
>
> Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.6.1
>
> Branch: 1.6.1-rc1
> SHA1: 88c5473b3b49d797d3dabebd12fe517e9b248ba2
> Staging Repository:
> *
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1017/
> <
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1017/
> >*
>
> Source tarball:
> *
> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1017/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.1/accumulo-1.6.1-src.tar.gz
> <
> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1017/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.1/accumulo-1.6.1-src.tar.gz
> >*
> Binary tarball:
> *
> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1017/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.1/accumulo-1.6.1-bin.tar.gz
> <
> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1017/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.1/accumulo-1.6.1-bin.tar.gz
> >*
> (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a
> given artifact.)
>
> Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
>
> Over 1.6.1, we have 188 issues resolved
> *
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=blob;f=CHANGES;h=91b9d31e3b9dc53f1a576cc49bbc061919eb0070;hb=1.6.1-rc1
> <
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=blob;f=CHANGES;h=91b9d31e3b9dc53f1a576cc49bbc061919eb0070;hb=1.6.1-rc1
> >*
>
> Testing: All unit and functional tests are passing.
>
> Vote will be open until Thursday, September 25th 12:00AM UTC (9/24 8:00PM
> ET, 9/24 5:00PM PT)
>

Reply via email to